1964 Austin Princess vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 820 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | Princess | Condor |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1812 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |