1964 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin Princess. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1964 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1964 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | Princess | Caprice |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |