1964 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Porsche Cayman
To start off, 2009 Porsche Cayman is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Porsche Cayman (261 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Porsche Cayman should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Austin Princess | 2009 Porsche Cayman | |
Make | Austin | Porsche |
Model | Princess | Cayman |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2901 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2420 mm |