1964 Austin Princess vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Princess | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2550 mm |
