1964 Austin Princess vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin Princess would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 722 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Austin Princess (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1964 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Austin Princess | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Austin | Mini |
| Model | Princess | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 47 L |
