1964 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Autobianchi Bianchina. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1964 Autobianchi Bianchina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Autobianchi Bianchina weights approximately 92 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Autobianchi Bianchina | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Autobianchi | Lotus |
Model | Bianchina | Elan |
Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 499 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 522 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 45 L |