1964 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 1989 Citroen XM is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Citroen XM (59 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1964 Autobianchi Primula.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (116 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. (93 Nm). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. 1989 Citroen XM has automatic transmission and 1964 Autobianchi Primula has manual transmission. 1964 Autobianchi Primula will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Citroen XM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Autobianchi Primula | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Autobianchi | Citroen |
Model | Primula | XM |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 116 Nm |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2470 mm |