1964 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Autobianchi Primula.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1964 Autobianchi Primula has manual transmission. 1964 Autobianchi Primula will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Primula | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | Primula | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
