1964 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 102 kg more than 1964 Autobianchi Primula.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Autobianchi Primula, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 585 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. (93 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Autobianchi Primula.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Primula | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | Primula | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2580 mm |
