1964 Autobianchi Primula vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Autobianchi Primula is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Autobianchi Primula (63 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Autobianchi Primula should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Autobianchi Primula weights approximately 148 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Autobianchi Primula, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Autobianchi Primula | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Autobianchi | MCC |
Model | Primula | Smart |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 53 HP |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 798 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |