1964 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2002 Holden HSV
To start off, 2002 Holden HSV is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Autobianchi Primula, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 599 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Autobianchi Primula. (93 Nm). This means 2002 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Autobianchi Primula.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Primula | 2002 Holden HSV | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Holden |
| Model | Primula | HSV |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 5698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 692 Nm |
| Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 263 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
