1964 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 1968 Citroen Dyane 6
To start off, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 765 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Autobianchi Stellina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Autobianchi Stellina weights approximately 70 kg more than 1968 Citroen Dyane 6.
Because 1964 Autobianchi Stellina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Citroen Dyane 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Stellina | 1968 Citroen Dyane 6 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Citroen |
| Model | Stellina | Dyane 6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 765 cc | 602 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 25 L |
