1964 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 666 kg more than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina.
Because 1964 Autobianchi Stellina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Stellina | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Stellina | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 765 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |
