1964 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Autobianchi Stellina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (313 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. (54 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Stellina | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Dodge |
| Model | Stellina | Neon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 765 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
