1964 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 2005 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. (27 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 615 kg more than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Autobianchi Stellina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Taurus (251 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina. (54 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Autobianchi Stellina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Autobianchi Stellina | 2005 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | Stellina | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 765 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63.5 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 68 L |
