1964 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 1998 Ford Cougar
To start off, 1998 Ford Cougar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Beijing BJ 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Beijing BJ 212 would be higher. At 2,445 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Cougar (128 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar should accelerate faster than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Beijing BJ 212 weights approximately 104 kg more than 1998 Ford Cougar.
Because 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Cougar (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (172 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Beijing BJ 212.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Beijing BJ 212 | 1998 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Beijing | Ford |
Model | BJ 212 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1291 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2800 mm |