1964 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Beijing BJ 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Beijing BJ 212 would be higher. At 2,445 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Beijing BJ 212.
Because 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 (172 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 Beijing BJ 212 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Beijing BJ 212 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Beijing | Chevrolet |
Model | BJ 212 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2210 mm |