1964 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Covie is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Beijing BJ 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Beijing BJ 212 would be higher. At 2,445 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Beijing BJ 212 weights approximately 645 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Suzuki Covie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (172 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Beijing BJ 212.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Beijing BJ 212 | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Beijing | Suzuki |
Model | BJ 212 | Covie |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2010 mm |