1964 Beijing BJ 212 vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Beijing BJ 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Beijing BJ 212 would be higher. At 2,445 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1964 Beijing BJ 212.
Because 1964 Beijing BJ 212 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Eos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Beijing BJ 212 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Beijing BJ 212. (172 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Beijing BJ 212.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Beijing BJ 212 | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Beijing | Volkswagen |
Model | BJ 212 | Eos |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2580 mm |