1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1949 Saab 92
To start off, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Saab 92 would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 1949 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1949 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 455 kg more than 1949 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 1949 Saab 92 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Saab |
Model | A3C | 92 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |