1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 160 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Studebaker |
Model | A3C | Commander |
Year Released | 1964 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3070 mm |