1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1990 Mercury Sable is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Sable weights approximately 140 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Mercury |
| Model | A3C | Sable |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
