1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 218 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Honda |
| Model | A3C | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |
