1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 405 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. 2002 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1964 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: