1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Volkswagen W12

To start off, 2002 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,982 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen W12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen W12 (600 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 9 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen W12.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volkswagen W12. (335 Nm). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volkswagen W12. 2002 Volkswagen W12 has automatic transmission and 1964 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen W12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: