1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2003 BMW M3
To start off, 2003 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 BMW M3. (342 HP @ 7900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW M3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW M3. (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2003 BMW M3 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | BMW |
Model | A3C | M3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7900 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |