1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (211 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 260 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
Model | A3C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2840 mm |