1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2005 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Cadillac Escalade. (346 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Cadillac Escalade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1267 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 2005 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
| Model | A3C | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 5998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 346 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2527 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2950 mm |
