1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2005 Ford Mustang. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 237 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Mustang. (326 Nm). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1497 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |
