1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Jaguar XK. (294 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 454 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jaguar XK. (411 Nm). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
| Model | A3C | XK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 411 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2590 mm |
