1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mariner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (201 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 239 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mariner. (262 Nm). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mariner.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mercury |
Model | A3C | Mariner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 262 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |