1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 16 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (868 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 868 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1244 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |
