1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2007 Cadillac CTS. (210 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2007 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Cadillac |
| Model | A3C | CTS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 2801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 263 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2890 mm |
