1964 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 124 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 212 kg more than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (617 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Bizzarrini A3C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bizzarrini A3C | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | A3C | E |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 5354 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 617 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4868 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2071 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1465 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2874 mm |
