1964 BMW 3200 CS vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1964 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1964 BMW 3200 CS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 BMW 3200 CS. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 BMW 3200 CS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 BMW 3200 CS | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 3200 CS | UTE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
