1964 BMW 700 vs. 2013 Mazda 5
To start off, 2013 Mazda 5 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1964 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1964 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 5 weights approximately 891 kg more than 1964 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 5 (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 BMW 700 | 2013 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 700 | 5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 696 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1551 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4585 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
