1964 Bristol 408 vs. 1942 Buick 40
To start off, 1964 Bristol 408 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1942 Buick 40. (163 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1942 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Buick 40 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1964 Bristol 408.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bristol 408 | 1942 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | 408 | 40 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 5249 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1805 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3000 mm |