1964 Bristol 408 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Bristol 408 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1964 Bristol 408.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 408 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 79 L |
