1964 Bristol 408 vs. 1999 Ford Windstar
To start off, 1999 Ford Windstar is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1999 Ford Windstar. (200 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Windstar.
Because 1964 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 1999 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 408 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3066 mm |
