1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2001 MG X20. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2001 MG X20.
Because 1964 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Bristol | MG |
| Model | 408 | X20 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
