1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Bristol 408 weights approximately 398 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bristol 408 (463 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1964 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Bristol 408 | 2005 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 408 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 72 L |