1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (211 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bristol 408 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 408 | Raider |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 83 L |
