1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Bristol 408 (216 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Bristol 408 (463 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 1964 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Bristol | Holden |
| Model | 408 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
