1964 Bristol 408 vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Milan weights approximately 106 kg more than 1964 Bristol 408.
Because 1964 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Bristol 408 | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
| Make | Bristol | Mercury |
| Model | 408 | Milan |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4801 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 64 L |
