1964 Buick Electra vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Buick Electra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 860 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Buick Electra | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Electra | 2000 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2700 mm |