1964 Buick Electra vs. 2002 Holden Astra

To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 880 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1964 Buick Electra has automatic transmission and 2002 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 2002 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1964 Buick Electra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: