1964 Buick Electra vs. 2006 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2006 Kia Carnival is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 Kia Carnival. (186 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 6 kg more than 2006 Kia Carnival. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Buick Electra | 2006 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Buick | Kia |
Model | Electra | Carnival |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 2654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2024 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2900 mm |