1964 Buick Electra vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1964 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1964 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 90 kg more than 2012 Cadillac SRX.
Because 1964 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Buick Electra | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Electra | SRX |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 308 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2807 mm |