1964 Buick Electra vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Buick Electra (275 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C. (245 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Buick Electra weights approximately 335 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Buick Electra | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Electra | C |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 245 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2008 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |