1964 Buick Electra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Buick Electra would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Buick Electra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Buick | Smart |
Model | Electra | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 1867 mm |